is there a goal for providing recommendations and strategy from the community building group? it seems prudent to provide this information as there is decreasing attendance and energy in many community meetings.
nearly nine months ago the community building working group met with different teams across project jupyter to address community quality and attrition. i personally represented the accessibility group to talk about community work, i’m attaching the notes from our discussion. at the end of that meeting i was very happy with the goals and questions you ask. when we left the meeting i mentioned that the next move is on y’all, and since then there has been nothing but deference. the community building working group needed to act, but instead there has been nine months of neglect and delay for recommendations. at this point, the community building working group should reassess their priorities and resourcing. the community deferred to y’all to improve the community, but instead the neglect excluded people from the community. i really hoped that governance formalizing DEI and community engagement would bring more inclusion, but as a member of the community i’ve been severely disappointed again.